COX

Tumors were resected from mice 10 days after orthotopic inoculation of 4T1-Luc2 cells, and hydrogels loaded with the following payloads were evaluated: anti–PD-1, anti-CTLA-4, IL-15sa, lenalidomide, celecoxib, STING-RR, or R848. Mice that did not receive a hydrogel were examined as a negative control. (A) IVIS imaging of 4T1-Luc2 cells is shown for all groups described and illustrates tumor burden.

Indicated PN and MES spheres were shown expressing GFP under the control of a 7 × TCF/LEF optimal promoter cassette (7 × TOP) and constitutively expressed nuclear mCherry. PN 84 and MES 1123 were treated with Wnt3a (200 ng/ml), indomethacin (Indo; 20 μM), or a control (vehicle). Scale bar, 100 μm. Bar graph, quantification of fluorescent signal of GFP (TOP-GFP) versus mCherry (PGK-H2BmCherry). The percentage of GFP- and mCherry-positive spheres was determined by FACS.

(d) Parental and regorafenib-resistant HCT116 cells were treated with 40 μM regorafenib, 20 μM sorafenib, 1 μM UCN-01, 1 μM YM-155, 10 μM roscovitine, 15 μM sunitinib, 10 μM crizotinib, 10 nM TRAIL, 10 μM VX680, 20 μM etoposide, 20 μM temsirolimus or 120 μM sulindac sulfide for 48 h. Apoptosis was analyzed as in b. (e) Western blotting of Mcl-1 in parental and regorafenib-resistant HCT116 cells treated with indicated agents as in d for 24 h. Results in (b-d) represent the means±s.d. of three independent experiments. NS, P>0.05; *P<0.05; **P<0.01.

Meloxicam (0.25 μg/ml) decreases the migration of CF41.Mg cells. Incubation with 0.25 μg/ml meloxicam for 24 and 48 h inhibited the migration of cells compared with the DMSO‑treated control cells in a wound healing assay. A total of 6 repeats were performed and results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Representative images of the wound healing assay and quantification if the results are presented. Scale bar, 90 μm. *P<0.05 vs. the control group.

Dexamethasone and largazole cooperate to suppress invasion and to restore E-cadherin localization to the cell peripher y. ( a) Phase contrast micrographs showing morphological changes in MDA-MB-231 cells induced by E-cadherin expression combined with 100 nM dexamethasone and 10 nM largazole treatments. Insets show the cells at higher magnification. (b ) Fluorescence (E-Cad-GFP) or immunofluorescence microscopy (g -catenin (g-Cat.)) of 231/E-Cad-GFP cells treated for 72 h with vehicle (Control), 100 n M dexamethasone, 10 nM largazole or 100 nM dexamethasone + 10 nM largazole (Dex. + Larg.). (c ) Invasion assays were per formed with the indicated cell lines treated for 72 h with or without 100 nM dexamethasone + 10 nM largazole using modified Boyden chambers impregnated with matrigel. The results are presented as the average number of cells that invaded through the membrane per field s.d. of five randomly chosen fields, and are representative of three independently per formed experiments.

(a) Treatment of HeLa cells with 1 mM bufexamac results in the induction of HIF1-α, as determined by immunoblotting. The known hypoxia mimetics CPX and DFX were used as positive controls; vinculin served as loading control. (b) Verification of bufexamac-specific upregulation of HIF1-α. HIF1-α protein expression was analyzed 4 h after treatment of cells with the indicated compounds. Ac, acetylated. (c) Time-course analysis of HIF1-α induction by bufexamac. The induction of HIF1-α protein was analyzed by immunoblotting. The graph shows rapid stabilization of HIF1-α upon bufexamac treatment with half-maximal intensity I1/2 of about 75 min. Error bars represent s.d. of three independent experiments. (d) HIF1-α is stabilized only at higher concentrations of bufexamac and accumulates in the nucleus. Induction of endogenous HIF1-α and its nuclear accumulation was analyzed using immunofluorescence microscopy; scale bar, 10 μm.

(A) Western blot analysis of MITF expression in MelIM. One representative experiment out of two is shown. (B) Proliferation of MelIM cells under diclofenac or lumiracoxib (0.1 mM) for 3 vs. 30 days. Results are given as percentage of untreated controls.

(B) HeLa and SACC-83 cells were treated with radiation, valdecoxib, or both radiation and valdecoxib. Cells were lysed or extracted for membrane proteins and then subjected to Western blot.

Nimesulide has no effect on KSHV lytic replication in BCBL-1 cells. The cells induced with TPA for 3 h were treated with the test compounds for 72 h. Then, the effect of nimesulide on cell viability (C) and the number of DNA copies (D) were measured as described in the Methods. CDV (20 µM) is a positive control for inhibiting viral DNA replication. Data were normalized as the fold change compared with the no-TPA induced control. The results are presented as the mean  values with standard deviations (n = 3).

(C)Percentage of TUNEL-positive cell in B were calculated. Data are mean ± SEM; ** P < 0.01 versus the Sham group; # P < 0.05 versus the Vehicle group; unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. n = 5 per group. (D-G) ELISA of cytokines IL-1α (D), IL-1β (E), IL-6 (F), and TNF-α (G) in tSCI rats with or without NS-398 treatment. Data are mean ± SEM; * P < 0.05 or ** P < 0.01 versus the Sham group; # P <0.05 versus the Vehicle group; unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. n = 5 per group. (H) The mean CBS score in tSCI rats was improved by NS-398 treatment. Data are mean ± SEM; ** P < 0.05 versus the Sham group; # P < 0.05 versus the Vehicle group; unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. n = 5 per group.

Tumors were resected from mice 10 days after orthotopic inoculation of 4T1-Luc2 cells, and hydrogels loaded with the following payloads were evaluated: anti–PD-1, anti-CTLA-4, IL-15sa, lenalidomide, celecoxib, STING-RR, or R848. Mice that did not receive a hydrogel were examined as a negative control. (A) IVIS imaging of 4T1-Luc2 cells is shown for all groups described and illustrates tumor burden.

Indicated PN and MES spheres were shown expressing GFP under the control of a 7 × TCF/LEF optimal promoter cassette (7 × TOP) and constitutively expressed nuclear mCherry. PN 84 and MES 1123 were treated with Wnt3a (200 ng/ml), indomethacin (Indo; 20 μM), or a control (vehicle). Scale bar, 100 μm. Bar graph, quantification of fluorescent signal of GFP (TOP-GFP) versus mCherry (PGK-H2BmCherry). The percentage of GFP- and mCherry-positive spheres was determined by FACS.

(d) Parental and regorafenib-resistant HCT116 cells were treated with 40 μM regorafenib, 20 μM sorafenib, 1 μM UCN-01, 1 μM YM-155, 10 μM roscovitine, 15 μM sunitinib, 10 μM crizotinib, 10 nM TRAIL, 10 μM VX680, 20 μM etoposide, 20 μM temsirolimus or 120 μM sulindac sulfide for 48 h. Apoptosis was analyzed as in b. (e) Western blotting of Mcl-1 in parental and regorafenib-resistant HCT116 cells treated with indicated agents as in d for 24 h. Results in (b-d) represent the means±s.d. of three independent experiments. NS, P>0.05; *P<0.05; **P<0.01.

Meloxicam (0.25 μg/ml) decreases the migration of CF41.Mg cells. Incubation with 0.25 μg/ml meloxicam for 24 and 48 h inhibited the migration of cells compared with the DMSO‑treated control cells in a wound healing assay. A total of 6 repeats were performed and results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Representative images of the wound healing assay and quantification if the results are presented. Scale bar, 90 μm. *P<0.05 vs. the control group.

Dexamethasone and largazole cooperate to suppress invasion and to restore E-cadherin localization to the cell peripher y. ( a) Phase contrast micrographs showing morphological changes in MDA-MB-231 cells induced by E-cadherin expression combined with 100 nM dexamethasone and 10 nM largazole treatments. Insets show the cells at higher magnification. (b ) Fluorescence (E-Cad-GFP) or immunofluorescence microscopy (g -catenin (g-Cat.)) of 231/E-Cad-GFP cells treated for 72 h with vehicle (Control), 100 n M dexamethasone, 10 nM largazole or 100 nM dexamethasone + 10 nM largazole (Dex. + Larg.). (c ) Invasion assays were per formed with the indicated cell lines treated for 72 h with or without 100 nM dexamethasone + 10 nM largazole using modified Boyden chambers impregnated with matrigel. The results are presented as the average number of cells that invaded through the membrane per field s.d. of five randomly chosen fields, and are representative of three independently per formed experiments.

(a) Treatment of HeLa cells with 1 mM bufexamac results in the induction of HIF1-α, as determined by immunoblotting. The known hypoxia mimetics CPX and DFX were used as positive controls; vinculin served as loading control. (b) Verification of bufexamac-specific upregulation of HIF1-α. HIF1-α protein expression was analyzed 4 h after treatment of cells with the indicated compounds. Ac, acetylated. (c) Time-course analysis of HIF1-α induction by bufexamac. The induction of HIF1-α protein was analyzed by immunoblotting. The graph shows rapid stabilization of HIF1-α upon bufexamac treatment with half-maximal intensity I1/2 of about 75 min. Error bars represent s.d. of three independent experiments. (d) HIF1-α is stabilized only at higher concentrations of bufexamac and accumulates in the nucleus. Induction of endogenous HIF1-α and its nuclear accumulation was analyzed using immunofluorescence microscopy; scale bar, 10 μm.

(A) Western blot analysis of MITF expression in MelIM. One representative experiment out of two is shown. (B) Proliferation of MelIM cells under diclofenac or lumiracoxib (0.1 mM) for 3 vs. 30 days. Results are given as percentage of untreated controls.

(B) HeLa and SACC-83 cells were treated with radiation, valdecoxib, or both radiation and valdecoxib. Cells were lysed or extracted for membrane proteins and then subjected to Western blot.

Nimesulide has no effect on KSHV lytic replication in BCBL-1 cells. The cells induced with TPA for 3 h were treated with the test compounds for 72 h. Then, the effect of nimesulide on cell viability (C) and the number of DNA copies (D) were measured as described in the Methods. CDV (20 µM) is a positive control for inhibiting viral DNA replication. Data were normalized as the fold change compared with the no-TPA induced control. The results are presented as the mean  values with standard deviations (n = 3).

(C)Percentage of TUNEL-positive cell in B were calculated. Data are mean ± SEM; ** P < 0.01 versus the Sham group; # P < 0.05 versus the Vehicle group; unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. n = 5 per group. (D-G) ELISA of cytokines IL-1α (D), IL-1β (E), IL-6 (F), and TNF-α (G) in tSCI rats with or without NS-398 treatment. Data are mean ± SEM; * P < 0.05 or ** P < 0.01 versus the Sham group; # P <0.05 versus the Vehicle group; unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. n = 5 per group. (H) The mean CBS score in tSCI rats was improved by NS-398 treatment. Data are mean ± SEM; ** P < 0.05 versus the Sham group; # P < 0.05 versus the Vehicle group; unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. n = 5 per group.