ALK

(c) Western blot analyses of p-Akt (Ser473) and p-S6RP (Ser235 and Ser236) in two RCT-E565 transplanted tumors treated with vehicle or PF02341066. Samples were isolated 4 h after the last dose from mice treated with PF02341066 for 3 d. (d) Responses of RCT-E565 transplanted tumors in athymic mice to PF02341066 or vehicle. Data are means ±s.e.m. (each group, n = 6). *P < 0.005, **P < 0.001 (Student^,s t test).

(A) H3122 xenografts harboring the EML4-ALK translocation were treated with control vehicle or the ALK inhibitor, TAE-684, for 2 days; the tumors were excised and lysates were prepared. The TIMM results for the control and treated animals are shown. (B) H3122 cells were treated in the presence or absence of TAE-684 (100 nM) for 6 hours in the presence or absence of the indicated ligands [EGF (50 ng/mL), IGF1 (50 ng/mL), and HGF (50 ng/mL)]. Extracts were probed with the indicated antibodies.

Immunoblot analysis of full-length DCTN1-ALK proteins. An expression vector encoding DCTN1-ALK cDNA was introduced into H1299 lung cancer cells, which do not express endogenous ALK. The transfectants were then exposed to crizotinib and alectinib. Levels of phosphorylation at tyrosine 1604 were determined 24 hours after treatment with 0, 0.2, 1.0, or 5.0 μM of each drug.

Quantitation of crystal violet uptake by ORF-expressing cells exposed to crizotinib (CRZ) or ceritinib (CER) normalized to Lac Z. Mean and SE are shown for six (CRZ) or four (CER) independent experiments of three replicates each.

Several ALK inhibitors effectively inhibit the growth of CD74–ROS1–addicted Ba/F3 cells. A, Ba/F3 cells expressing CD74–ROS1 (clone #6) were seeded in 96-well plates and treated with the indicated concentration of crizotinib, ceritinib, AP26113, ASP3026, or alectinib for 72 hours. Cell viability was analyzed using the CellTiter-Glo Assay. B, IC50 values (nmol/L) of Ba/F3 cell lines expressing CD74–ROS1 (clone #6) against various ALK inhibitors are shown. Average IC50 values against crizotinib, ceritinib, or AP26113 were calculated from the three independent experiments. IC50 values against ASP3026 and alectinib were calculated from the single experiment. C, inhibition of phospho-ROS1 by various ALK inhibitors in Ba/F3 models. CD74–ROS1–expressing Ba/F3 cells were exposed to increasing concentrations of crizotinib, ceritinib, AP26113, ASP3026, or alectinib for 3 hours. Cell lysates were immunoblotted to detect the indicated proteins.

Protective effect of IGF1 on Sorafenib or VK1-mediated actin cytoskeleton redistribution in HCC cells. PLC/PRF/5 and HLF cells were stained with DyLight 554 Phalloidin after treatment with 1 μM Sorafenib, 12 μM VK1 or 1 μM GSK1838705A (GSK) for 24 h alone or in combination with 40 ng/ml IGF1. Scale bar: 100 μm.

(E) Immunoblot analysis of lysates of A4573 and TC32 cells following exposure to media only (Control, C); ST/V and V/ST with (+) or without (-) 20 nM AZD3463 using antibodies against ALK, IGF-1R, STAT3 (Y705), p-STAT3, AKT, p-AKT (S473), MAPK, p-MAPK (p42/44).

Tumor cells were treated with entrectinib (10 nmol/L) for 4 hours or c-PARP for 48 hours, and harvested lysates were assessed by Western blotting. Data shown are representative of three independent experiments with similar results.

Immunoblotting analysis of H3122 and H3122-CER cells showing that brigatinib did not inhibit EGFR phosphorylation (p-EGFR). Total EGFR (t-EGFR) is also shown. Actin was used as a loading control. The cells were treated with brigatinib for 2 hours.

Sub-G1 and cell cycle phase distribution of NBLW and NBLW-R cells treated for 24 hours with DMSO, 1× or 10× the respective GI 50 concentrations of PF-06463922.

(c) Western blot analyses of p-Akt (Ser473) and p-S6RP (Ser235 and Ser236) in two RCT-E565 transplanted tumors treated with vehicle or PF02341066. Samples were isolated 4 h after the last dose from mice treated with PF02341066 for 3 d. (d) Responses of RCT-E565 transplanted tumors in athymic mice to PF02341066 or vehicle. Data are means ±s.e.m. (each group, n = 6). *P < 0.005, **P < 0.001 (Student^,s t test).

(A) H3122 xenografts harboring the EML4-ALK translocation were treated with control vehicle or the ALK inhibitor, TAE-684, for 2 days; the tumors were excised and lysates were prepared. The TIMM results for the control and treated animals are shown. (B) H3122 cells were treated in the presence or absence of TAE-684 (100 nM) for 6 hours in the presence or absence of the indicated ligands [EGF (50 ng/mL), IGF1 (50 ng/mL), and HGF (50 ng/mL)]. Extracts were probed with the indicated antibodies.

Immunoblot analysis of full-length DCTN1-ALK proteins. An expression vector encoding DCTN1-ALK cDNA was introduced into H1299 lung cancer cells, which do not express endogenous ALK. The transfectants were then exposed to crizotinib and alectinib. Levels of phosphorylation at tyrosine 1604 were determined 24 hours after treatment with 0, 0.2, 1.0, or 5.0 μM of each drug.

Quantitation of crystal violet uptake by ORF-expressing cells exposed to crizotinib (CRZ) or ceritinib (CER) normalized to Lac Z. Mean and SE are shown for six (CRZ) or four (CER) independent experiments of three replicates each.

Several ALK inhibitors effectively inhibit the growth of CD74–ROS1–addicted Ba/F3 cells. A, Ba/F3 cells expressing CD74–ROS1 (clone #6) were seeded in 96-well plates and treated with the indicated concentration of crizotinib, ceritinib, AP26113, ASP3026, or alectinib for 72 hours. Cell viability was analyzed using the CellTiter-Glo Assay. B, IC50 values (nmol/L) of Ba/F3 cell lines expressing CD74–ROS1 (clone #6) against various ALK inhibitors are shown. Average IC50 values against crizotinib, ceritinib, or AP26113 were calculated from the three independent experiments. IC50 values against ASP3026 and alectinib were calculated from the single experiment. C, inhibition of phospho-ROS1 by various ALK inhibitors in Ba/F3 models. CD74–ROS1–expressing Ba/F3 cells were exposed to increasing concentrations of crizotinib, ceritinib, AP26113, ASP3026, or alectinib for 3 hours. Cell lysates were immunoblotted to detect the indicated proteins.

Protective effect of IGF1 on Sorafenib or VK1-mediated actin cytoskeleton redistribution in HCC cells. PLC/PRF/5 and HLF cells were stained with DyLight 554 Phalloidin after treatment with 1 μM Sorafenib, 12 μM VK1 or 1 μM GSK1838705A (GSK) for 24 h alone or in combination with 40 ng/ml IGF1. Scale bar: 100 μm.

(E) Immunoblot analysis of lysates of A4573 and TC32 cells following exposure to media only (Control, C); ST/V and V/ST with (+) or without (-) 20 nM AZD3463 using antibodies against ALK, IGF-1R, STAT3 (Y705), p-STAT3, AKT, p-AKT (S473), MAPK, p-MAPK (p42/44).

Tumor cells were treated with entrectinib (10 nmol/L) for 4 hours or c-PARP for 48 hours, and harvested lysates were assessed by Western blotting. Data shown are representative of three independent experiments with similar results.

Immunoblotting analysis of H3122 and H3122-CER cells showing that brigatinib did not inhibit EGFR phosphorylation (p-EGFR). Total EGFR (t-EGFR) is also shown. Actin was used as a loading control. The cells were treated with brigatinib for 2 hours.

Sub-G1 and cell cycle phase distribution of NBLW and NBLW-R cells treated for 24 hours with DMSO, 1× or 10× the respective GI 50 concentrations of PF-06463922.