Category

Archives

RAPAMYCIN

Introduction: The mTOR pathway

Rapamycin is a molecule which was discovered as a byproduct of bacterial action in a soil sample from Easter Island. During extract screening it was observed that this molecule specifically targeted a previously unknown protein [1;2]. This protein was purified and characterized in an intensive series of research programs. The name given to this protein was the acronym mTOR (meaning “mammalian Target for Rapamycin”). The importance of this molecule was slowly uncovered as it demonstrated significant regulatory abilities in gene transcription and cellular growth processes. The unusual aspect of this protein was its structural resemblance to the lipid kinases but its multi faceted functions similar to the serine/threonine kinases [3]. Multiple domains were identified which responded to ligands directly from the extracellular systemic circulation and from indirect triggers from other pathways. Triggers initiated by Rapamycin mTOR inhibitor lead to adaptation of other mechanisms [4], building of scaffolds for DNA repair, actin organization [5], initiation of the start codon (AUG) in gene transcription [6] and to regulate its own activity [7;8].

Rapamycin: Properties and Availability

Rapamycin. Originally it was developed as a fungicide but other properties were discovered in relation to clinical activity which outweighed its fungicide effects. Rapamycin was determined to be a potent immunosuppressant and it is used extensively in suppresses transplant rejection. Rapamycin synthesis is an example of the industrial adaptation of biosysnthesis techniques and is a multistage fermentation process [9-12]. Rapamycin is being developed now by Pfizer but originally was introduced by Wyeth-Ayerst, it is marketed under the trade names of Rapamune and Sirolimus. The Rapamycin structure is based on a methoxy substituted cyclic diene trione and the Rapamycin molecular weight is 914.2. Soluble in DMSO and ethanol to a saturation of 50mg/ml Rapamycin solubility in water or buffered solutions is limited. The Rapamycin IC50 for purified mTOR is in the 1 -2 nM range but specific mTOR1 or mTOR2 IC50’s are not listed. Rapamycin is supplied as a lyophilized powder which can be stored at -20°C with an expiration date of 2 years. Rapamycin stability when in solution is unstable, it is recommended that all solutions be kept at -20°C for a maximum of 3 months with minimal thawing. Researchers can buy Rapamycin through a number of Rapamycin suppliers with the Rapamycin cost of a 50 mg vial ranging from $53 up to $1649 for the sterilized product. The range of the Rapamycin price is extreme and researchers should be aware of the fact.

Rapamycin: Clinical status and investigational progress

The range and breath of the effects determined for this molecule is vast, which is to be expected considering its role in the cellular pathways. Its highest volume use is as an immunosuppresser after transplant surgery where it is highly effective in preventing organ rejection [13-15], it was FDA approved in the maintenance therapy after kidney transplants, but is under investigation for a range of transplant activities. More recently it was realized that mTOR is a functional part of many of the pathways being investigated in terms of tumor development. Rapamycin was tested preclinically and found to posses potent anti tumor activity. Subsequently Rapamycin cancer analogues have been derivatized into analogues several of which have been FDA approved for the treatment of various solid tumor types, for example Everolimus. Rapamycin clinical trials have been initiated in lymphoma, glioblastoma, NSCLC, renal carcinoma, advanced solid tumors, diabetes (focusing on Macular disorders), metastatic cancer and osteosarcoma [16-23]. A topical Rapamycin form has even been used for a variety of facial and skin disorders [24-29]. Under the trade name Sirolimus, it has been approved for use as an immunosuppresser in the form of an oral solution showing clear clinical benefits.

References

    1.    Gangloff YG, Mueller M et al. Disruption of the mouse mTOR gene leads to early postimplantation lethality and prohibits embryonic stem cell development. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24(21):9508-9516.

    2.    Murakami M, Ichisaka T et al. mTOR is essential for growth and proliferation in early mouse embryos and embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24(15):6710-6718.

    3.    Harris TE, Lawrence JC, Jr. TOR signaling. Sci STKE 2003; 2003(212):re15.

    4.    Karar J, Maity A. PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway in Angiogenesis. Front Mol Neurosci 2011; 4:51.

    5.    Caron E, Ghosh S et al. A comprehensive map of the mTOR signaling network. Mol Syst Biol 2010; 6:453.

    6.    Liu L, Parent CA. Review series: TOR kinase complexes and cell migration. J Cell Biol 2011; 194(6):815-824.

    7.    Steelman LS, Chappell WH et al. Roles of the Raf/MEK/ERK and PI3K/PTEN/Akt/mTOR pathways in controlling growth and sensitivity to therapy-implications for cancer and aging. Aging (Albany NY) 2011; 3(3):192-222.

    8.    Chappell WH, Steelman LS et al. Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK and PI3K/PTEN/Akt/mTOR inhibitors: rationale and importance to inhibiting these pathways in human health. Oncotarget 2011; 2(3):135-164.

    9.    Swindells DCN, White PS et al. X-Ray Crystal-Structure of Rapamycin, C51H79No13. Canadian Journal of Chemistry-Revue Canadienne de Chimie 1978; 56(18):2491-2492.

  10.    White PS, Swindells DCN. 3-Methoxy-6-Oxaestra-1,3,5(10)-Triene-7,17-Dione 17 (Ethylene Acetal). Acta Crystallographica Section B-Structural Science 1980; 36(FEB):491-493.

  11.    White PS, Swindells DCN. 7-Hydroxy-3-Methoxy-6-Oxaestra-1,3,5(10)-Trien-17-One. Acta Crystallographica Section B-Structural Science 1980; 36(FEB):489-491.

  12.    Swindells DCN, White PS et al. 17-Methoxy-16,17-Seco-8-Alpha,13-Alpha-Androsta-4,9(11)-Diene-3,15,17-Trione. Acta Crystallographica Section B-Structural Science 1981; 37(JAN):263-265.

  13.    Thomson AW. Immunosuppressive drugs and the induction of transplantation tolerance. Transpl Immunol 1994; 2(4):263-270.

  14.    Sehgal SN. Immunosuppressive profile of rapamycin. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1993; 696:1-8.

  15.    Shitrit D, Yussim A et al. Role of siroliumus, a novel immunosuppressive drug in heart and lung transplantation. Respir Med 2004; 98(9):892-897.

  16.    Buhaescu I, Izzedine H et al. Sirolimus--challenging current perspectives. Ther Drug Monit 2006; 28(5):577-584.

  17.    Rangan GK. Sirolimus-associated proteinuria and renal dysfunction. Drug Saf 2006; 29(12):1153-1161.

  18.    Kneteman NM, Oberholzer J et al. Sirolimus-based immunosuppression for liver transplantation in the presence of extended criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl 2004; 10(10):1301-1311.

  19.    Paghdal KV, Schwartz RA. Sirolimus (rapamycin): from the soil of Easter Island to a bright future. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 57(6):1046-1050.

  20.    Campsen J, Zimmerman MA et al. Sirolimus and liver transplantation: clinical implications for hepatocellular carcinoma. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2007; 8(9):1275-1282.

  21.    Cutler C, Antin JH. Sirolimus immunosuppression for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis and therapy: an update. Curr Opin Hematol 2010; 17(6):500-504.

  22.    Sanchez-Plumed JA, Gonzalez MM et al. Sirolimus, the first mTOR inhibitor. Nefrologia 2006; 26 Suppl 2:21-32.

  23.    Lee VW, Chapman JR. Sirolimus: its role in nephrology. Nephrology (Carlton ) 2005; 10(6):606-614.

  24.    Tabbara KF. Pharmacologic strategies in the prevention and treatment of corneal transplant rejection. Int Ophthalmol 2008; 28(3):223-232.

  25.    Roa J, Tena-Sempere M. Energy balance and puberty onset: emerging role of central mTOR signaling. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2010; 21(9):519-528.

  26.    De MA, Fouchard N et al. Cutaneous and mucosal aphthosis during temsirolimus therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma: review of cutaneous and mucosal side effects of mTOR inhibitors. Dermatology 2011; 223(1):4-8.

  27.    Elad S, Epstein JB et al. Topical immunomodulators for management of oral mucosal conditions, a systematic review; Part II: miscellaneous agents. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2011; 16(1):183-202.

  28.    Perez L, Anasetti C et al. Have we improved in preventing and treating acute graft-versus-host disease? Curr Opin Hematol 2011; 18(6):408-413.

  29.    Pilotte AP, Hohos MB et al. Managing stomatitis in patients treated with Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2011; 15(5):E83-E89.